|
PRESBYTERY COUNCIL January 8,
2008 Presbytery office
The
Council of the Presbytery Minnesota Valleys was called
to order at 10:00 a.m. by the vice-chair Norma
Spurgin.
Those present included:
Rev. Dawn Carder, Presbytery Moderator LeRoy
Ennenga, Presbytery Vice-Moderator Rev. Sue Coller,
Executive Presbyter Rev. Pam Prouty, Stated
Clerk Class of 2008 Rallah Madison Grayson
Osteraas Rev. Dawn Linder Rev. Norma Spurgin
Class of 2009 Rev. Roger Grussing Dale
Champ Rev. Dan Billings Rev. Bob Bartlett Nancy
Chamberlain Class of 2010 Rev. Al
Jergenson Rev. Christina Berry Kathy
Terpstra Rev. Randy Lubbers
Ex-Officio present: Karen
Lange, Administrative Assistant and Virginia Molitor,
Financial
Those
excused included: Roger Grussing (Class of 2009),
Connie Seltz (Class of 2008), Donna Hendel (Class of
2010)
We
started with introductions and devotions by Norma
Spurgin.
The
proposed agenda was approved.
The
minutes from the November 13, 2007 were
approved.
Council committee reports
Budget and Finance: Grayson
Osteraas gave an oral report.
-
COUNCIL VOTED to move $10,000 from reverses to
be used for gasoline and the rest if needed to be used
for building supplies for the Gulf Coast Mission
Blitz, if needed.
-
Presently we have $5881.00 on hand from
Presbytery congregations for building
supplies.
-
At some point we need to have a discussion
about policy and procedures for our
accounting.
COUNCIL VOTED to receive the per capita and
mission giving reports to date and the profit and loss
and balance sheet.
Click here for
finance reports
COUNCIL VOTED to grant permission to the
following congregations Spicer, Hope, Fergus Falls
Federated and First, Jackson to pay their per capita on
a monthly basis.
Personnel There was no
report.
Leadership Team We discussed
the November Presbytery meetings of meeting around
tables, the logistics of it and the worshipful work
learnings. The Leadership Team will consider
having one meeting a year at a site where we could meet
around table.
We
discussed developing a nomination task force for
Council. COUNCIL VOTED
to table the discussion of a nomination task force until
the next meeting.
Council Task Force
reports
Communication Task Force Karen reported that
Duane Sweep has all the surveys and they are being
tabulated. On February 28, they will be
meeting.
Task
Force to recommend a process for the nomination of
General Assembly Commissioners and Presbytery
officers Roger has asked Elder Lew Hudson and the
Rev. Dean Williams to be on this task force along with
Rallah Madison and Grayson Osteraas from Council.
We still need one person from Nominating Committee and
the Committee on Representation to be on this task
force. Grayson and Rallah will take the lead in
figuring out when this task force will
convene.
The
Sartell Administrative Commission Recommendations We
had a discussion about the recommendations from the
Sartell Administrative Commission.
A
motion was made to adopt the recommendations from the
Sartell Administrative Commission as follows.
1. Presbytery and its Committees encourage
churches to keep “covenant” as noted in the Book of
Order and the attached document.
2. Presbytery continually seeks to connect
better with churches and provide opportunities for
churches to connect with each other.
3. Clusters of group of churches find and
develop with passion new ministries relevant to their
communities. Funding for these new joint
ministries could come for the net proceeds of the
Riverside AC.
4. Committee on Ministry annually reviews
the leadership of pastors, lay pastors, and stated
supply as consistent with the Book of Order and reformed
traditions.
5. Presbytery develops unified educational
plan/program for all church officers and through the
clusters offer training for Session
members.
6. Expand the Review of Session Records to
include a content review. This content review
should include documentation of discord among church
members, concerns about pastor or higher governing
bodies, withholding of per capita, how mission dollars
are being distributed, where youth groups are attending
camps, what Sunday School curriculum is being used,
which publications members read regularly, revisions to
By-Laws and memberships in specific interest
groups.
7. Presbytery collects and has on file a
copy of every church’s Articles of Incorporation,
By-Laws and deeds to property. These documents
strengthen the Presbytery’s position with regard to
ownership of church property and protect the Presbytery
in the event of any future property disputes.
Articles of Incorporation will prove that the church is
a Minnesota non-profit organization. The By-Laws
should contain the necessary language that incorporates
the Book of Order as its governing document. The
deeds should contain language that the property is held
in trust for the Presbytery of Minnesota
Valleys.
This
action was defeated.
COUNCIL VOTED that when we appoint Council
liaisons to committees/ministry action teams that the
liaisons can help the committees/ministry action teams
implement the recommendations from the Sartell
Administrative Commission. The vote passed
by a show of hands 8-7 with one abstention.
Norma
asked Grayson to take over the meeting so she could
speak to the action. After she spoke, Norma
resumed as chair.
Task Force on the Use of the Riverside
Net Proceeds Gloria VandeBrake gave the following
report: Report to Council January 8, 2008 Task
Force on the Use of Riverside Net Proceeds
Recommendations
The
Task Force on the Use of the Net Proceeds of the
Riverside Administrative Commission recommends the
following from the sale of property of the Riverside
Presbyterian Church in Sartell to the Riverside
Evangelical Church, estimated at $278,567.50:
1. 10% or $27,856.75 to go to mission
outside our borders. Social Action Ministries will
determine an appropriate mission: one or more projects
or support of long-term mission staff.
2.
$50,000 invested with the Presbyterian Foundation for
New Church Development. Budget & Finance
Committee will decide annually whether the earned
interest will stay invested or allocated to L5007 New
Church Development. Task Force recommends that
local churches be strongly involved and committed to New
Church Development and these funds can assist in
marketing studies, programming dollars and staff when
the need occurs.
3. $30,000 allocated to a renamed L5065
Pastoral/Congregational Support and Development.
Committee on Ministry and Congregational Growth and
Development can utilize these funds in consultation with
each other for such activities including but not
limiting to pastoral coaching and mentoring, training on
leadership development, dealing with congregational
change & conflict management, pastoral self-care
& retreats, short-term conflict intervention in
churches, and elder training and development conducted
at the cluster level.
4.
The remaining $170,710.75 invested in a trust fund with
the Presbyterian Foundation called Congregational
Transformation”. L5012 Revitalization and L5015
Redevelopment will be combined into a new L account
called “Congregational Transformation.” Churches can
apply for these funds to Congregational Growth &
Development for projects such as but not limited to
shared ministries among churches for youth, ethnic
populations, elderly & other staff, cluster
development, and development of unique ministries.
Budget & Finance Committee will determine annually
whether earned interest from this Congregational
Transformation Trust Fund is to be reinvested in the
trust fund or if transferred. If transferred, 70%
of the interest will go to the L account on
Congregational Transformation and 30% would go to L5065
Pastoral/Congregational Support and Development.
Budget & Finance Committee should also consider the
value of future dollars to ensure that the trust fund
remains solvent for future generations.
5. Since the Presbytery will unlikely
request additional offerings for Renew the Church,
one-third of L5014 Renew the Church Offering or $500.70
be transferred to L5007 New Church Development and
two-thirds or $1016.56 be transferred to the new L
Congregational Transformation account.
6. After all expenses of Riverside
Administrative Commission has been paid, remaining
dollars from L5033 New & Emerging Mission and L5096
Sartell Church be allocated to the Congregational
Transformation Trust Fund and these L accounts can be
eliminated. Task Force on the Use of Riverside Net
Proceeds Saturday, January 5, 2008
Minutes
Members Present: Darlene King, Herb Rotunda
and Gloria Vande Brake Members Absent: Beverly
Modlin Staff Present: Sue Coller
Sue
explained that the purpose of bringing this group
together was to recommend to Council the guidelines for
distributing the net proceeds from the sale of the
Riverside Presbyterian Church Property in Sartell to the
Riverside Evangelical Church. The Riverside
Administrative Commission recommended that the funds be
used for mission and ministry in the
Presbytery.
The
Committee members shared their ideas and those of others
on how to use the funds as follows:
• A tithe to be used for mission. Task Force
members strongly believe that since we ask our churches
to tithe to missions beyond their walls, we also need to
model that commitment to mission. • New Church
Development in growing communities as well as ethnic
groups. Task Force agreed that for new church
development to be successful, local churches must be
committed and that initial Presbyterian funds are used
better for marketing studies, programming and staff
rather than investing in property and
buildings. • Ethnic Ministries: hiring staff to
work with churches such as Marshall, St. James, Willmar
and Worthington to build relationships between the
churches and their ethnic
populations. • Development of pastoral coaches
& spiritual directors, training in creating change
in congregations, dealing with conflict & leadership
development, and providing short-term intervention staff
to churches in crisis or conflict. • Providing
elder and lay member training at the cluster
level. • Funds for shared ministries in youth
programs, ethnic ministries, shared
staff. • Hire staff to work with clusters.
It was noted that without local pastors/lay leadership
commitment, cluster activities are minimal.
The Task Force discussed using the Millennium
Trust Fund for all or part of the dollars.
However, that Trust Fund requires that one-third of the
earned interest be used for new church development,
one-third for redeveloping churches and one-third for
revitalizing churches. The Task Force believed
that the distinction between redeveloping churches and
revitalizing churches is largely a GA funding definition
and that we could combine those funds. They also
felt that at this time, there is a greater need for
funds to assist churches in their own transformation as
they seek to ministry in their communities.
Finally, the members strongly encouraged churches to
work together in shared ministries.
The
Task Force then recommended the following from the sale
of property of the Riverside Presbyterian Church in
Sartell to the Riverside Evangelical Church, estimated
at $278,567.50:
1. 10% or $27,856.75 to go to mission
outside our borders. Social Action Ministries will
determine an appropriate mission: one or more projects
or support of long-term mission staff.
2.
$50,000 invested with the Presbyterian Foundation for
New Church Development. Budget & Finance
Committee will decide annually whether the earned
interest will stay invested or allocated to L5007 New
Church Development. Task Force recommends that
local churches be strongly involved and committed to New
Church Development and these funds can assist in
marketing studies, programming dollars and staff when
the need occurs.
3. $30,000 allocated to a renamed L5065
Pastoral/Congregational Support and Development.
Committee on Ministry and Congregational Growth and
Development can utilize these funds in consultation with
each other for such activities including but not
limiting to pastoral coaching and mentoring, training on
leadership development, dealing with congregational
change & conflict management, pastoral self-care
& retreats, short-term conflict intervention in
churches, and elder training and development conducted
at the cluster level.
4.
The remaining $170,710.75 invested in a trust fund with
the Presbyterian Foundation called Congregational
Transformation”. L5012 Revitalization and L5015
Redevelopment will be combined into a new L account
called “Congregational Transformation.” Churches can
apply for these funds to Congregational Growth &
Development for projects such as but not limited to
shared ministries among churches for youth, ethnic
populations, elderly & other staff, cluster
development, and development of unique ministries.
Budget & Finance Committee will determine annually
whether earned interest from this Congregational
Transformation Trust Fund is to be reinvested in the
trust fund or if transferred. If transferred, 70%
of the interest will go to the L account on
Congregational Transformation and 30% would go to L5065
Pastoral/Congregational Support and Development.
Budget & Finance Committee should also consider the
value of future dollars to ensure that the trust fund
remains solvent for future generations.
5. Since the Presbytery will unlikely
request additional offerings for Renew the Church,
one-third of L5014 Renew the Church Offering or $500.70
be transferred to L5007 New Church Development and
two-thirds or $1016.56 be transferred to the new L
Congregational Transformation account.
6. After all expenses of Riverside
Administrative Commission has been paid, remaining
dollars from L5033 New & Emerging Mission and L5096
Sartell Church be allocated to the Congregational
Transformation Trust Fund and these L accounts can be
eliminated.
Submitted in
Christ, Gloria Vande Brake, Acting
Secretary
COUNVIL VOTED to recommend to Presbytery to
accept and adopt the recommendations from the Task Force
on the Use of the Riverside Net Proceeds and have the
Budget and Finance committee carry through on the
mechanics on distributing the monies.
We
broke for lunch at 12:10 p.m. with prayer. We
reconvened at 12:45 p.m.
Assignments for 2008 COUNCIL
VOTED to appoint the following people to Council
committees and as committee/ministry action
liaisons: Budget and
Finance Grayson Osteraas, chair Rallah
Madison LeRoy Ennenga Donna Hendel (Norma will ask
her)
Personnel Dawn Linder Bob
Bartlett, chair Nancy Chamberlain
Committee
liaisons Congregational Growth and
Development-Christina Berry Congregational
Resources-Kathy Terpstra Social Action Ministry-Randy
Lubbers Committee on Ministry-Dawn
Carder Committee on Preparation for Ministry-Dawn
Linder Nominating Committee-Connie Seltz Committee
on Representation-Connie Seltz International
Partnerships-Dan Billings Leadership Development for
Ministry-Norma Spurgin Clearwater Camp and Lake
Okoboji-Rallah Madison Session Records-Pam
Prouty Self Development of People-Norma
Spurgin Leadership, Care and Encouragement-Al
Jergenson
People signed up for Devotions as
follows: January-Norma Spurgin, March-Dawn
Carder, April-Grayson Osteraas, June-Randy Lubbers,
August-Christina Berry, October-Al Jergenson and
November-Roger Grussing
Other Reports Executive
Presbyter Sue presented the following report
along with Appendix A:
Executive Presbyter Report Council
Meeting January 8, 2008
Updates:
1. Gulf Coast Mission Blitz – 45 people from
our presbytery going – one family member from Florida
joining us. Most are carpooling down, leaving
either Friday Jan 18 or Saturday Jan 19. Most will
arrive back either Jan 26 or 27. A few are staying
in the New Orleans area to do more mission
work.
2. Committee Mash – Dawn Linder and I are
participating on behalf of council.
Representatives from Congregational Growth and
Development, Congregational Resources, Committee on
Ministry and Social Action Ministry are taking
part. These are the questions they started
with: i. What are we doing (or supposed to be
doing) ii. What are we doing that isn’t a
priority? iii. What are we doing (or supposed to
be doing) that is essential? iv. How can we best
organize ourselves and use our resources to do what we
need to do? See Committee Mash Notes for
details. Conversations are ongoing, this is just a
preliminary report. 3. 6- Pac Conversations –
next meeting, February 17-18, Eau Claire, WI. Rev.
Ann Philbrick has been hired to facilitate and lead that
meeting. Participating for Minnesota
Valleys: Connie Seltz, Colby Anderson, Steve
Boots, Christina Berry. See attached notes for
more info.
Stated Clerk Pam Prouty
presented the following report:
STATED CLERK’S REPORT To
the COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA VALLEY”S
PRESBYTERY JANUARY 8, 2008
1. I have received several requests to host
Presbytery in 2009; here is what I have so far…..
Amboy-May Worthington-May Fergus Falls,
Federated-September Pipestone-December Renville-December Normally
Council recommends to the May meeting of Presbytery the
locations of Presbytery meetings.
2. COUNCIL VOTED to dissolve the
Administrative Commission to install the Rev. Leah
Hauser; this service took place on Sunday, November 18,
2007 at Fergus Falls, Federated. I have the
minutes on file.
3. Hopefully clerks of session are working
on submitting their annual reports.
Presbytery Moderator Dawn
Carder will be attending the installation service of the
Rev. Anna Williamson at the Browns Valley church this
Sunday, January 13, 2008 at 4:00 p.m.
Committee Mash Dawn Linder
presented the following report:
Committee Mash
Notes: December 11, 2007
Involved in Conversation and summary of what each
is responsible for: Congregational Growth and
Development – Shirley Luhmann, Christina
Berry • Allocate funds for revitalization
efforts, Computers for churches, Theological Loan
program • Counsel congregations regarding
mission and ministry • New church
development • Beginning to work directly with
congregation in revitalization
efforts Congregational Resources – Karen
Ferkinhoff, Mark Chamberlain • Provide resources
in following areas: o Christian Education –
Stewardship – Evangelism - Mission • Allocate
funds for Synod school scholarships, Camp scholarships,
workshops Committee on Ministry – Richard
Underdahl-Peirce • Focused on healthy ministry
and relationships between
congregation/pastor/presbytery • Pastoral
transitions • Address conflict • Develop
relationships with congregations • Pastoral
support Social Action Ministry – Randy
Lubbers • Allocate funds to churches independent
organizations working in Social Action
Ministry • Encourage congregations to focus on
immigration issues and the hidden needy in their
communities Council Representatives – Dawn
Linder, Sue Coller
We
looked very briefly at the organization of 3 different
Presbyteries: 1. Prospect Hill – new structure
not tried yet:
a. Council will now be the Mission Board, absorbs
functions of Coordinating Council Mission, Strategy and
Visioning Committees. Members include At Large
mission leaders and ex officio members from Regional
Partnerships and Working
Groups b. Working
Groups - to improve coordination and workings of the
Mission Board. Three
groups:
i. Leadership: Includes Committee on
Ministry, Committee on Preparation for Ministry,
Nominating, Personnel
Committees
ii. Issues and Policy: responsible for policy
and procedures, issues and disaster response.
Includes PJC, Admin. Commissions, Bills & Overtures
Committee. May assume some Committee on Ministry
casework.
iii. Financial Development: Responsible for
mission financing and oversight. Includes mission finance, budget,
funding, stewardship,
audit.
c. Regional Partnerships - somewhat similar to our
clusters – geographical clustering of congregations for
mission and ministry, with elected person to the Mission
Board.
2. Beaver-Butler –
a. Congregational Strategy Unit – developing
healthy and growing
congregations.
b. Congregational Leadership Unit – Training
congregational
leaders c. Congregational
Resources Unit – Securing
funds
d. Congregational Collaboration Unit – Organizing
mutual
ministries e. Congregational
Mission Unit – Encouraging mission
involvement
f. Presbytery Administrative Unit – carrying out
the administrative tasks of the presbytery
3. Des Moines
– a. Support
of Local
Ministries: i. Congregational
Care and Development Committee (part of Committee on
Ministry) ii. Professional
Care and Development Committee (part of Committee on
Ministry) iii. Regional
Partner Groupings and
Facilitators
b. Governance (Includes the following
committees):
i. Committee on Preparation for Ministry, Permanent
Judicial Commission, Committee on Representation, Budget
& Finance, Nominating, Sexual Response Team,
Personnel
Committee c. Extension
of Ministries (Include the following Task
Forces):
i. New Church Development, Social Ministries,
C.R.O.S.S. Ministries, Presbytery Day, Camping / Youth
Ministries, Women Advocacy, Worship, Peace Unity and
Purity, Sudanese Ministries, Transformation Team,
Stewardship and Mission Interpretation
A few items were decided
upon:
• Everything related to Health Ministries
(specifically parish nursing but including other related
things that may arise) has been given to Social Action
Ministry
• Committee on Ministry would have a pastor focus,
Congregational Growth and Development would have a
congregation focus and would be intentional about
keeping communication open between the two
committees
• Grants that were “automatic” (camp scholarships,
Synod school scholarships) – criteria and guidelines
will be developed, and then Virginia will be asked to
dispense them according to guidelines. These are
grants that do not require a decision about who will get
them and who won’t – everyone who fits the guidelines
will receive them until funds run out. Then the
committee (Congregational Resources in this case) will
consider if they want to free up more funds for the
grants.
• Ask the Council to discern if New Church
Development is what our presbytery is called to pursue
at this time, and if it is determined that it is, to ask
Presbytery to form a New Church Development Committee
charged with that one task. Suggested that such a
committee be made up of people
o with a passion for new church
development,
o who will learn from other presbyteries and
denominations about what is working and what is not in
new church development in similar areas to ours,
o willing and with a desire to become “experts” in
facilitating new church development (not necessarily to
be the ones to “do” new church development)
A few questions were posed
without answers: • What
would be lost if Congregational Growth and Development
and Congregational Resources
merged? • What would
change for Social Action Ministry if all mission
responsibilities were moved from Congregational
Resources to Social Action
Ministry? • Should
Presbytery be giving money to mission
projects?
o Congregation-based (i.e. a food shelf run by a
congregation or group of
congregations)
o Presbytery-based (i.e. the Gulf Mission Blitz or
Guatemala water
projects)
o Outside the congregation (i.e. a mission in the
local community independent of the church)
4 Areas of Focus were identified
as critical:
1. Congregational
Strategies
a. Might be include Congregational Growth and
Development, Congregational Resources, and some
Committee on Ministry
functions
2. Pastoral
Strategies
a. Might be the majority of what Committee on
Ministry focuses
on
3. Mission
Strategies
a. Might include Social Action Ministry,
International Partnerships, and Self-Development
of
People
4. Relationship
Strategies
a. Is this something that the council might focus
on?
b. What happens with the clusters?
-
Needs
Identified: 1. Ways to connect with
congregations 2. Ways to connect with
pastors 3. Ways to help congregations identify
needs vs. wants and provide resources for those
needs a. Person / coaching
/ advising resources
b. Material resources
c. Financial resources What is it important
that the presbytery do? There was some agreement
about the first two listed below under mission, but we
did not finish this conversation about the
others. Although we did talk about maybe the
importance of having POINT people, and maybe they
become the experts at what resources are out there,
and that congregational resources in some way, shape,
or form (who knows what that means!) might be part of
congregational growth and development. Obviously
that needs a lot more conversation. It would be
interesting to ask the leadership (committees,
council) what they think about these things
– 1. Mission -
a. Do Hands On (i.e. Gulf Mission Blitz)
(Committee Mash said YES)
b. Be a catalyst for congregations to do
mission (Committee Mash said
YES) 2. Transformation
- a. Working with
individual churches
b. Focused on ministry of the local
congregation c. Raising up
and Empowering leaders 3. Resource -
a. Provide programmatic
resources Next Meeting of Committee Mash February
2, 2008, 2 pm immediately following the
-
Congregational Growth and
Development Committee meeting.
The
Committee Mash is asking for Council to discern about
new church development. At our next Council
meeting we will spend 30 minutes in prayer and
discernment about new church development.
We
had a discussion around the questions: 1) What
is our vision? 2) How do we build
relationships? 3) How do we
model/discuss/communicate theological
discussions?
COUNCIL VOTED to have their Council meetings in
clusters in 2008 and invite people from the
congregations in the clusters to come to these
meetings. Logistics will be worked out by the
Leadership Team.
We
adjourned at 2:00 p.m.
Our
next meeting will be in March.
Respectfully submitted,
Pamela Prouty Stated
Clerk APPENDIX A Six
Pak Notes from October 28-29, 2007 meeting
What
is the purpose of us getting together? The
following are the ideas that were shared in this time
(each --------- indicates a shift to the next person’s
ideas in the discussion):
What
is to be expected from any future
gathering: 1. A discussion on the purpose –
“What is the purpose of a presbytery? 2. What
does the Book of Order Call for – a freedom to break
some of the rules 3. Establishing goals and
objectives 4. Small wins – how to fulfill the
purpose efficiently – coming up with concrete ways
presbyteries can partner together in ministry.
To
bring together exec and lay leadership of Wisconsin and
Minnesota to discuss the future in two ways: 1.
Small, concrete ways to partner now
(subgroups) 2. Long term, adaptive planning in
context of Synod ************ 1. To give a
little context wherever they look at Presbytery (Book of
Order) and proposed from above Don’t reinvent the
wheel. Context for nitty gritty. 2. Pick
one or two areas: i.e. COM where reps meet –
talk about how to work in light of purpose – way
to do things together.
**************** 1. To discern things
Presbyteries do together, things to do better together
(ie background checks) 2. Long overview of PCUSA
in Wisconsin and Minnesota – look at the decline.
Vision for future. Where is the church
going? *********** 1. To discuss possible
ways to work together on a smaller scale by partnering
with 1 or more Presbyteries and work in specific areas
together: i.e. CPM, COM, Mission,
Personnel 2. Discuss possible ways to address
the large picture for the future
(Synod) ************ Specific
ways to partner and how to move ahead to implement
this. 1. Identify areas of chaos. Don’t
have answers: What is known about the road
map. 2. Who is in as a working partner?
Who is in as a
cheerleader? *************
1. Define goals and objectives for a Presbytery
– then what volunteer system is needed to make this
happen. 2. What staff is needed to
make the system/purpose
work? ***********
Next
meeting: February 17-18, 2008 in Eau Claire,
WI Sunday at 4 pm until Monday at 3 pm (23 hour
gathering)
CUANDO
What: Purpose, Balcony conversation,
Dreaming
What: 2 conversations: a. Balcony –
purpose of Presbytery b. Small win – i.e.
reference checks
Preparation for February 17-18
Gathering in Eau Claire
PLACE: Sharon will check about the use of
the Eau Claire Church Ken will select housing and
arrange for 3 meals
Time: Event will go from 5pm Sunday,
February 17 to 4 pm Monday, February 18
Pre-meeting Preparation 1. Each
Presbytery will orient team coming – team will consist
of 4 volunteers plus one staff person from each
presbytery AND 4 representatives from Synod.
2. Material for orientation will sent out to
participants. It will include: a. cover
letter b. agenda (Gregg will
prepare) c. unpack “balcony” – “Good to Great”
by Jim Collins – (Sue will provide a guide to
language) d. BOO and each presbytery’s
mission statements i. copies of first 4
chapters ii. copies of relevant portions of
Chapter 11 and 9 e. Proposed form of government
(FOG) (to be sent to each participant) - not
for debate but used for information purposes
Purpose – What – 2 conversations done
in two parts: 1. Balcony, purpose
of presbytery (possibly Sunday evening and short
time Monday morning) 2. small
wins – (reference check conversation etc)
Event will be divided into two parts
Facilitator for the event will be
determined in a conference call at 4:30 pm on November
9, 2007
|